AI Risk Readiness Assessment
Find out what data your AI tools can access and what could go wrong.
When AI gets ahead of you
Most organizations have an AI governance problem. Here's what that looks like:
- Sensitive data gets entered without visibility or controls
- Everyone assumes someone else is handling risk
- Your staff could violate compliance requirements
- There's no plan for how to respond if there's an issue
What this assessment evaluates
Our AI Risk Readiness Assessment is a structured engagement that evaluates your organization's AI use, governance posture, and regulatory exposure across four areas.
AI use
Data governance
Regulatory compliance
Responsible practices
Takeaways from our AI risk assessment
Most organizations are making AI decisions without a clear picture of their exposure. It's a complex but solvable problem.
An AI-related risk summary
A clear, 90-day action plan
Answers to tough questions
Frequently asked questions
AI governance is a new priority for most organizations — and the questions we hear reflect that.
Any organization where employees are using AI tools — whether formally adopted or not. If your team is using generative AI tools for drafting, summarizing, analyzing, or automating work, and you don't have formal policies governing that use, Marco's AI Risk Readiness Assessment is relevant to you.
That's exactly when this assessment is most valuable. Shadow AI — tools employees use without formal IT approval — is one of the most common sources of AI risk.
Marco's AI risk readiness assessment surfaces what's actually in use across your organization, not just what's been officially sanctioned.
At Marco, we ground this assessment in the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, which provides a structured approach to identifying, measuring, and managing AI risk. Where relevant, we'll also note exposure to emerging regulatory requirements that may affect your industry.
A cybersecurity assessment evaluates your security program — policies, configurations, and framework alignment.
Marco's AI Risk Readiness Assessment specifically evaluates how AI tools are being used in your organization, the governance structures around them, and your regulatory exposure.
The regulatory landscape is moving fast, but the foundational governance work Marco's assessment produces doesn't expire.
Documenting your AI use cases, establishing accountability structures, and benchmarking against NIST AI RMF gives you a baseline that makes adapting to new requirements significantly easier than starting from scratch.
Yes. One of the most consistent outcomes organizations report is having documented, defensible answers to questions from customers, insurers, and regulators about how AI is being used and governed.
Browse other trending topics
If you run PaperCut NG or PaperCut MF, this is the one advisory to stop and read today. In short: PaperCut has confirmed active, real-world exploitation of a vulnerability affectin...
I talk to defense contractors every week who know they need CMMC certification but aren't sure where to start. Some are waiting for more clarity from the government. Some think the...
Get ahead of your AI risk
AI is a powerful tool. And like any powerful tool, it needs to be used responsibly.